Re: [INTERFACES] Field types (was Re: Return value of int)

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at){druid|vex}(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Field types (was Re: Return value of int)
Date: 1999-05-04 06:59:19
Message-ID: 372E9AC7.965858D2@trust.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
>
> Thus spake Tom Lane
> > Hugh Lawson <hglawson(at)nr(dot)infi(dot)net> writes:
> > > I'm just getting started on fiddling with libpq. I am wondering why
> > > this passage from man libpq doesn't address this issue? I'm not being
> > > a smarty here, I just don't know the answer.
> >
> > > PQftype returns the field type associated with the
> > > given field index. The integer returned is an
> > > internal coding of the type.
> >
> > Unless I missed what D'Arcy was getting at, his point was that when
> > PQftype tells you the field type is, say, 23, how do you know what
> > that means?

do "select * from pg_type where oid=23" and work from there on.

The 'internal coding' actually means OID for that type definition row.
(Could someone post a patch for docs ?)

the base types ids are quite stable and could possibly be found in some
.h file,
but anything new you add gets o quite random OID.

------------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message abdelkrim 1999-05-04 08:21:41 Re: [INTERFACES] pb when creating user type
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1999-05-04 06:45:27 Re: [INTERFACES] Error linking C++ code.