Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd)

From: Brian P Millett <bpm(at)ec-group(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd)
Date: 1999-04-29 14:59:05
Message-ID: 372873B9.7E10A34@ec-group.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> writes:
> > The weird thing is that the JDBC driver hasn't been sending an empty
> > string since 6.2.x.
> > It would be interesting to see if this patch fixes it however.
>
> I'm unsure whether to blame my empty-query goof for the JDBC problem or
> not. You say Monday's snapshot was OK --- but I committed that booboo
> on Sunday, so it should have been in Monday's snap. Let us know whether
> the problem is still there...

Well Tom,
The patch fixed it. With the snapshot from 4/28/1999, I can now
connect.

Thanks Peter, Michael & Tom.

--
Brian Millett
Enterprise Consulting Group "Heaven can not exist,
(314) 205-9030 If the family is not eternal"
bpm(at)ec-group(dot)com F. Ballard Washburn

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Weinberg 1999-04-29 15:21:41 Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table
Previous Message Mark Jewiss 1999-04-29 14:57:38 Re: [SQL] LIMIT