Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date: 2024-04-09 13:46:10
Message-ID: 3721908.1712670370@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> By the way, are you planning to do something like [1]? I've not
> looked in details at the callers of IPC::Run::timeout, still the extra
> debug output would be nice.

It needs more review I think - I didn't check every call site to see
if anything would be broken. I believe Andrew has undertaken a
survey of all the timeout/timer calls, but if he doesn't produce
anything I might have a go at it after awhile.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-04-09 14:27:10 Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2024-04-09 13:45:11 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser