Re: Pgpool-II, pgcluster, or pgbouncer?

From: "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu>
To: "Joseph Mays" <mays(at)win(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pgpool-II, pgcluster, or pgbouncer?
Date: 2014-07-17 18:00:17
Message-ID: 37197.192.168.207.54.1405620017.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> I have a site that has a postgres database server. 24 hour availability is
> pretty critical to them, so I want to turn it into a redundant cluster for
> high availability. I currently have a streaming backup server, but we want
> to be able to make either server capable of accepting writes in the case
> one fails. The problem with streaming backup is that we can promote the
> backup when the master fails, but when the master comes backup you
> basically have to rebuild the entire database and reconfigure postgres on
> it to either make it the master or make it into a new streaming backup. We
> want something that’s much more dynamic, so writes can go either direction
> in the event of one or the failing, and so that things will automatically
> resync when a failed server in the cluster comes back online.
>
> Given these goals – pgpool-II, pgcluster, pgbouncer? Some other tool that
> I haven’t even considered?

Your need multi-Master?

Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
La Habana, Cuba

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 179 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Potentialtech 2014-07-17 18:01:03 Re: Checkpoint_segments optimal value
Previous Message Prabhjot Sheena 2014-07-17 17:44:32 Checkpoint_segments optimal value