| From: | "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joseph Mays" <mays(at)win(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pgpool-II, pgcluster, or pgbouncer? |
| Date: | 2014-07-17 18:00:17 |
| Message-ID: | 37197.192.168.207.54.1405620017.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> I have a site that has a postgres database server. 24 hour availability is
> pretty critical to them, so I want to turn it into a redundant cluster for
> high availability. I currently have a streaming backup server, but we want
> to be able to make either server capable of accepting writes in the case
> one fails. The problem with streaming backup is that we can promote the
> backup when the master fails, but when the master comes backup you
> basically have to rebuild the entire database and reconfigure postgres on
> it to either make it the master or make it into a new streaming backup. We
> want something that’s much more dynamic, so writes can go either direction
> in the event of one or the failing, and so that things will automatically
> resync when a failed server in the cluster comes back online.
>
> Given these goals – pgpool-II, pgcluster, pgbouncer? Some other tool that
> I haven’t even considered?
Your need multi-Master?
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
La Habana, Cuba
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 179 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Potentialtech | 2014-07-17 18:01:03 | Re: Checkpoint_segments optimal value |
| Previous Message | Prabhjot Sheena | 2014-07-17 17:44:32 | Checkpoint_segments optimal value |