From: | "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu> |
---|---|
To: | "Joseph Mays" <mays(at)win(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pgpool-II, pgcluster, or pgbouncer? |
Date: | 2014-07-17 18:00:17 |
Message-ID: | 37197.192.168.207.54.1405620017.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> I have a site that has a postgres database server. 24 hour availability is
> pretty critical to them, so I want to turn it into a redundant cluster for
> high availability. I currently have a streaming backup server, but we want
> to be able to make either server capable of accepting writes in the case
> one fails. The problem with streaming backup is that we can promote the
> backup when the master fails, but when the master comes backup you
> basically have to rebuild the entire database and reconfigure postgres on
> it to either make it the master or make it into a new streaming backup. We
> want something that’s much more dynamic, so writes can go either direction
> in the event of one or the failing, and so that things will automatically
> resync when a failed server in the cluster comes back online.
>
> Given these goals – pgpool-II, pgcluster, pgbouncer? Some other tool that
> I haven’t even considered?
Your need multi-Master?
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
La Habana, Cuba
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 179 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Potentialtech | 2014-07-17 18:01:03 | Re: Checkpoint_segments optimal value |
Previous Message | Prabhjot Sheena | 2014-07-17 17:44:32 | Checkpoint_segments optimal value |