From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | ERR ORR <rd0002(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Question on Trigram GIST indexes |
Date: | 2013-01-23 03:05:11 |
Message-ID: | 3718.1358910311@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
ERR ORR <rd0002(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Queries which use "WHERE "TST_PAYLOAD" LIKE 'SEAT%'" go to the btree
>> index as it should.
>> Queries which use "WHERE "TST_PAYLOAD" LIKE '%EAT%'" *should* use the
>> GIST index but do a full table scan instead.
Are you sure it "should" use the index for that? That query doesn't
look very selective to me --- it might well be deciding that a seqscan
is cheaper. You could try forcing the issue with enable_seqscan = off
to see if the query is really unable to match the index, or it just
doesn't like the cost estimate.
> Would it help to `ALTER DATABASE set lc_collate = 'C'`,supposing that is
> possible? (Oracle doesn't allow that iirc)
FWIW, I think you do want the index to have the database's default
collation, otherwise it could only match LIKE clauses that explicitly
specify the same non-default collation.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-01-23 07:03:23 | Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage |
Previous Message | Edson Richter | 2013-01-22 20:14:18 | Re: What is the impact of "varchar_pattern_ops" on performance and/or memory |