Re: [GENERAL] Retrieval of OO objects.

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Retrieval of OO objects.
Date: 1999-04-17 00:34:51
Message-ID: 3717D72B.688C6025@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Oliver Elphick wrote:

> If you need features of bbb and ccc you must use those classes, not their
> ancestor.
>
> Class bbb knows about a and b and class ccc knows about a and c, but
> aaa doesn't know about b and c because they are not defined in aaa.
>
> `Vertebrate' is a descendant class of `animal'. `Vertebrate' has a feature
> `bones', but `animal' doesn't, because the majority of animals don't have
> bones at all.
>
> This is how inheritance works in the Eiffel language, at least.

I guess the point is if you had an Eiffel collection of animals, two
Invertebrates and two vertibrates, and did a save to disk. When you
loaded the collection back in from disk you wouldn't expect to get back
4 animals, whose status as vertibrates or invertibrates is no longer
known.

In a real object database, you could say "Get all the animals", and they
would come back appropriately - some as vertibrates, some as
invertibrates. Since they come back properly we can call methods on
different types of animals and they will behave differently as
appropriate.

--
Chris Bitmead
http://www.bigfoot.com/~chris.bitmead
mailto:chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-04-17 04:02:20 Re: [GENERAL] The WWW of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 1999-04-16 17:57:03 Re: [GENERAL] Retrieval of OO objects.