Re: Index location patch for review (more pgbench resul

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net'" <jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index location patch for review (more pgbench resul
Date: 2001-09-13 17:01:58
Message-ID: 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E3201677F@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Moving the test to a system with SCSI disks gave different results.
> There is NO difference between having the indexes on the same disk or
> different disk with the data while running pgbench. So I
> leave it up to you guys as to include the patch or not. I do believe
> that even if performance doesn't increase, this patch as alot of other
> benefits for admins.

Agreed.

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-09-13 19:45:36 Re: [JDBC] Re: What needs to be done?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-13 17:00:26 Re: Escaping strings for inclusion into SQL queriesh