RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Don Baccus'" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-24 17:00:31
Message-ID: 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E32016650@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> Impractical ? Oracle does it.
> >
> >Oracle has MVCC?
>
> With restrictions, yes.

What restrictions? Rollback segments size?
Non-overwriting smgr can eat all disk space...

> You didn't know that? Vadim did ...

Didn't I mention a few times that I was
inspired by Oracle? -:)

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-05-24 17:30:39 RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Previous Message Tony Reina 2001-05-24 16:51:05 Shared memory for RH Linux 7.1