From: | Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Davis <michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing |
Date: | 1999-03-30 05:04:32 |
Message-ID: | 37005B60.A99BDC@manhattanproject.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> int2 .. failed
> int4 .. failed
Both int2 and int4 have been consistently failing
for me, but it is due to a wording problem:
pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
instead of
pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Numerical result out of range
Also, float8 usually fails for me, due to the expected
being a 'result is out of range' error, and the result being:
> ! bad|?column?
> ! ---+--------
> ! |0
> ! |NaN
etc.
> geometry .. failed
This almost always fails due to a rounding differences.
Is there a way to build the rounding into the test
so that it would fail if something is _really_ wrong?
> triggers .. failed
For me, "check_primary_key: even number of arguments should be specified"
is shown as an error, which is not 'expected', then, as a result,
everything else in the test fails.
This is definately a problem.
> misc .. failed
> plpgsql .. failed
I'm not too sure about these.. I had a host of other failures, but
this was due to me running the test in the wrong account....
running it in the right account now. :)
> I am running Red Hat 5.1 on intel. Should I be concerned about these? I am
> eager to get up and running on 6.5 but always seem to run into one obstacle
> or another.
I have the same configuration, Pentium Pro, RH 5.1 almost stock configuration.
Clark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-03-30 05:20:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing |
Previous Message | Michael Davis | 1999-03-30 05:04:23 | Create user is failing under 6.5 |