Re: Benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Denis Lussier <denis(dot)lussier(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmark comparing PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle
Date: 2009-02-22 02:04:49
Message-ID: 36e682920902211804y2d5cafa5o802861996dc120be@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Denis Lussier <
denis(dot)lussier(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As the author of BenchmarkSQL and the founder of EnterpriseDB.... I
> can assure you that BenchmarkSQL was NOT written specifically for
> PostgreSQL. It is intended to be a completely database agnostic
> tpc-c like java based benchmark.

With the exception that it analyzes Postgres tables but not Oracle or
InnoDB, I agree with that. The goal of BenchmarkSQL was to be a database
agnostic benchmark kit.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-22 03:41:41 Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4
Previous Message Scott Carey 2009-02-21 19:29:10 Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4