Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-11-26 01:56:12
Message-ID: 36e682920811251756x76baf32bve4dec812a131c1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't this is not empirical but really, 150 is very reasonable. Let's
> just set it to that by default and be done with it. It won't hurt
> anything and if they need more than that, they are already investigating
> either via the lists or via a vendor anyway.

Agreed.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-26 02:03:25 Re: Column reordering in pg_dump
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-26 01:38:09 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard