Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-13 14:24:41
Message-ID: 36e682920806130724u474b0a6bkded8b9fd0adc7d83@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> Many others do this also, but my concern is with how we can create the
>> right conditions under which contribution is a positive thing for the
>> contributor, not just a charitable, and therefore a more optional, act.
>
> enhancements that they make that aren't key to their central
> commercial problem are enhancements they don't want to
> maintain privately, because it's just distracting.

Well said IMHO.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-13 14:47:18 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-06-13 14:15:46 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives