Re: Project name - statement from the core team

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Project name - statement from the core team
Date: 2007-11-16 13:52:07
Message-ID: 36e682920711160552g751ff40fraa30ed15bd519301@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Nov 16, 2007 5:51 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Following recent discussions on a name change for the project, it has
> become clear that consensus within the community will never be reached.
> In light of this, the core team have discussed the matter in depth and
> decided that the project shall continue to use the name PostgreSQL, but
> accept the use of Postgres as an alias.

So, what exactly does that mean? Basically everything is as-is, yes?

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-11-16 14:04:50 Redirects for gborg are in place
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-11-16 10:51:03 Project name - statement from the core team