From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Project name - statement from the core team |
Date: | 2007-11-16 13:52:07 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920711160552g751ff40fraa30ed15bd519301@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Nov 16, 2007 5:51 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Following recent discussions on a name change for the project, it has
> become clear that consensus within the community will never be reached.
> In light of this, the core team have discussed the matter in depth and
> decided that the project shall continue to use the name PostgreSQL, but
> accept the use of Postgres as an alias.
So, what exactly does that mean? Basically everything is as-is, yes?
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-11-16 14:04:50 | Redirects for gborg are in place |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-11-16 10:51:03 | Project name - statement from the core team |