| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thousands of tables versus on table? |
| Date: | 2007-06-06 19:40:46 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920706061240m4855a18ava914ab072984a256@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 6/6/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> Well, you will always have to deal with the sort of people who will
> base their technical prescriptions on the shiny ads they read in
> SuperGlobalNetworkedExecutiveGoFast, or whatever rag they're reading
> these days.
Always.
> I usually encourage such people actually to perform the
> analysis of the license, salary, contingency, and migrations costs
Yes, this is the best way.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-06 19:40:58 | control of benchmarks (was: Thousands of tables) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-06 19:32:11 | Re: Thousands of tables versus on table? |