Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing

On 5/16/07, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> Set a fixed date (ie. 3 weeks) and whatever isn't in gets punted to 8.4 ... if
> that means those 'large patches' don't get applied, so be it ...

I disagree with that approach. Larger more complex patches required
much more work and effort than small, simple ones. Not only do I
think it's unfair to the authors who spent considerably more time on
their work, but I think it also sets a bad precedent for future work;
saying, in short, that if you want to make large strides to improve
PostgreSQL, and you followed the community development process, you're
still potentially last in line for review.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/