| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hubert FONGARNAND" <informatique(dot)internet(at)fiducial(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | "Mark Cave-Ayland" <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Edwin Ramirez" <edwin(dot)ramirez(at)mssm(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WITH support |
| Date: | 2007-01-03 23:19:19 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920701031519p27842136r9d6b3a58e86f1606@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/3/07, Hubert FONGARNAND <informatique(dot)internet(at)fiducial(dot)fr> wrote:
> Why not looking at http://gppl.moonbone.ru/ evgen potemkin. has ever made a
> patch for WITH and CONNECT BY?
Nope, no good. This is what I started with last time and the
refactoring attempt at WITH is just too massive. As for CONNECT BY,
PostgreSQL does not want the syntax, they want ANSI/ISO WITH
[RECURSIVE]... so even starting there isn't great.
This is really something that needs to be decided on before
implementation... or it will probably never get in.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-01-03 23:21:54 | Re: WITH support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-03 23:05:40 | Re: proposal - new SPI cursor function |