Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-20 05:50:40
Message-ID: 36e682920612192150v553e7644q9dac787b8bc6bab7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/19/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think we should just accept the strings case-insensitively, too.

While acknowledging Peter's pedantically-correct points, I say +1 for
ease of use.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-12-20 06:05:30 Interface for pg_autovacuum
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2006-12-20 05:39:24 Re: PQencryptPassword() and encoding