Re: pg_upgrade: downgradebility

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: downgradebility
Date: 2006-09-22 03:23:22
Message-ID: 36e682920609212023q402a99bcofd1d8c2ed575e80a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/21/06, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> OK ... can we re-name the project, please, though? It's going to be
> hard for employees of other companies to contribute to the "EnterpriseDB
> Migrator". Maybe "PGMigrator" with EnterpriseDB leading off the
> discription?

I can't personally make that call but I'll discuss it with everyone
tomorrow and get back to you.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-09-22 03:39:16 Re: Optimising a query requiring seqscans=0
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-22 03:18:42 Re: pg_upgrade: downgradebility