Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 19:26:03
Message-ID: 36e682920608041226k6028cb8fod01e7fc13111754e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/4/06, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Also, if something is on the TODO list, the community doesn't need to
> shoot signal rockets to tell people it is important. The fact it is on
> the TODO list indicates it is significant, unless you are told
> otherwise.

True, but stating that you want certain items in the TODO list done
for a certain release is another thing. Being on the TODO list has
nothing to do with if/when a TODO item will be worked-on or released.

> Shifting blame on an incomplete feature to the community
> doesn't help anyone.

I don't believe any one is at fault.

-Jonah

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 19:27:34 Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-04 19:19:48 Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold