| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum row? |
| Date: | 2006-06-26 14:04:02 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920606260704k695c17c4nc183089706173cf6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/26/06, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Is it really nessisary make personal comments like this? Lets discuss
> "ideas" not personalities or people.
Chill dude :) All I was saying is that if you look at past threads,
this is a heavily discussed and near-religious topic. Doing some
research before firing another shot across the bow wouldn't hurt. I
do like the discussion though, it's good... I was just making an
observation that it could've been brought up in a little more
constructive way as there's a good amount of detail on Firebird's MVCC
(not that it's perfect either), but it's a mature implementation sort
of similar to the method you're discussing.
Please don't take it personally... it surely wasn't meant that way.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-06-26 14:15:54 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-06-26 14:02:55 | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |