Re: Google SoC--Idea Request

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Date: 2006-04-25 05:50:59
Message-ID: 36e682920604242250r13108475x91e4bb55045e0d16@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/25/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> We have already done some initdb tuning improvements for 8.2

Cool, I hadn't looked at this.

> I would have liked to increase max_connections too, but that would have
> caused problems on OSX, apparently. See previous discussion.

Yeah, their defaults really suck.

> Personally I would much rather see a tuning advisor tool in more general
> use than just provide small/medium/large config setting files.

True dat.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wes 2006-04-25 05:57:04 Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-04-25 05:43:15 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request