Re: WAL Bypass for indexes

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Martin Scholes" <marty(at)iicolo(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Date: 2006-04-03 04:53:02
Message-ID: 36e682920604022153g77b30409xd0973ef611432b20@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/2/06, Martin Scholes <marty(at)iicolo(dot)com> wrote:
> The lesson here is that whatever WAL magic has been performed on the latest
> release gives over 100% speedup, and the speedup is so good that skipping
> WAL for indexes does basically nothing.

No need for me to reply to earlier messages :)

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-03 05:48:19 Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-04-03 04:24:33 Re: semaphore usage "port based"?