From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | DB2-style INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING |
Date: | 2006-03-12 16:11:53 |
Message-ID: | 36e682920603120811x547032bbq8b17c5d1e3b3bc32@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was talking with Jonathan Gennick about the INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING stuff,
and he recommended looking into the way DB2 handles similar functionality.
After looking into it a bit, it's more inline with what Tom's suggestion was
regarding a query from the operation rather than returning the values in the
manner currently required.
Here's DB2's syntax... does anyone have any familiarity with it?
Simply put, it's sort-of like:
SELECT * FROM (FINAL | NEW | OLD) TABLE (INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE)
I'd like to hear from anyone that's used it to see if it really is better...
logically it seems nicer, but I've never used it.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan de Visser | 2006-03-12 18:10:59 | Re: [PERFORM] Hanging queries on dual CPU windows |
Previous Message | William ZHANG | 2006-03-12 15:39:07 | Re: Proposal for updatable views |