Re: INS/UPD/DEL Returning P.tch

If this is the consensus, then I'm fine with posting to -patches... I just
want to make sure people are aware of it so it can get tested. Thanks.

On 3/2/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This is only the current patch updated to apply cleanly on cvs... it's
> not
> > ready for -patches yet as I still haven't spent much time looking
> through it
> > and testing it. This is just for anyone to play with and find issues.
>
> Somebody else already did this in the last few days -- post a patch to
> -hackers instead of -patches, claiming that since it's not ready, it's
> not suitable for the latter. I think this is a mistake; a patch is a
> patch, whether it's ready for application or not, so it should be posted
> to pgsql-patches. You can of course indicate that the patch is a
> work-in-progress and that it shouldn't be applied yet.
>
> Anyway thanks for the patch,
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324