From: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lack of T_TargetEntry in exprType function |
Date: | 2018-03-20 14:21:21 |
Message-ID: | 36db3d92-08e4-e18a-d185-5cce9795887b@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.03.2018 17:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>> Is there any reason for not handling T_TargetEntry node kind in
>> exprType() function in nodeFuncs.c?
> It's intentional because that's not considered an executable
> expression.
I tried to apply this function to the argument of Aggref and it has
exactly this kind.
Aggref is executable expression. This is why I thought that all its
arguments also should be considered as executable expressions, shouldn't
they?
My idea was to capture argument of one aggregate and use it in another
aggregate during query transformation.
Certainly it is not a problem for me to handle this case myself, but I
just wonder will it be more natural to extend exprType to handle this
node kind as well.
>
>> But why in this case it is handled in the exprLocation function?
> There are lots of things that have syntactic locations but aren't
> value-yielding expressions.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= | 2018-03-20 14:23:12 | Re: configure's checks for --enable-tap-tests are insufficient |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2018-03-20 14:18:15 | Re: INOUT parameters in procedures |