| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | bamby(at)marka(dot)net(dot)ua, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer |
| Date: | 1999-03-18 18:56:32 |
| Message-ID: | 36F14C60.A80D697F@krs.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> So, yes, I suppose there is an inconsistency there. Zero-sized
> tables(according to vacuum), use index, while tables with some data
> don't use index.
>
> How does the system know there is a row in there if you didn't run
> vacuum? That confuses me.
Create index updates ntuples & npages in pg_class...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-03-18 18:58:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-18 18:56:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-03-18 18:58:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-18 18:56:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] General Bug Report: Bug in optimizer |