| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Subqueries and indexes |
| Date: | 1999-03-18 02:34:16 |
| Message-ID: | 36F06628.C40D1FC0@krs.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > While the index usage is good, the fact is the subquery is executed for
> > every row of markmain, isn't it? That's one query executed for each row
> > in markmain, isn't it?
>
> I just tried this with NOT EXISTS, and it was VERY fast. Can we discuss
> the issues, and perhaps auto-rewrite these as exists. Is that always
> better than hash?
Not always, but there is no hashing currently, so you could try
re-writing for IN/NOT IN subqueries without aggregates...
Keep in mind that expression subqueries must return <= 1 rows,
so it's probably better don't rewrite them (or you'll have to
add this check to EXISTS code).
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-18 02:38:48 | Re: [HACKERS] "CANNOT EXTEND" - |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-03-18 02:33:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Sequences.... |