Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2
Date: 1999-03-16 04:54:25
Message-ID: 36EDE401.9277B552@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > select currval('"Aa"');
>
> Someone complained they could not get a sequence named "Aa" because the
> code auto-lowercased the nextval parameter. The new code accepts
> nextval('"Aa"'), and preserves the case. Other cases are
> auto-lowercased.

No, just looked in new code and seems that your changes in
parse_func.c handle currval() and setval() as well, sorry.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-16 04:57:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-16 04:50:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2