Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL EndTransactionBlock and not inprogress/abort state

From: Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
To: Manuel Lemos <mlemos(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL EndTransactionBlock and not inprogress/abort state
Date: 1999-03-14 07:23:53
Message-ID: 36EB6409.707BA66F@manhattanproject.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Clark Evans wrote:
>
> Manuel Lemos wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to use transactions with PostgreSQL with the normal sequence
> >
> > BEGIN
> > one or more SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE queries
> > COMMIT
> > END
> >
> > But I am getting the following message just like if I haven't started a
> > transaction when I commit.
> >
> > EndTransactionBlock and not inprogress/abort state
> >

Oops! forgot the semicolon. *whap*

>
BEGIN;
> ....
> COMMIT;
>
> <or>
>
BEGIN;
> ....
> ROLLBACK;
>

BTW, are you putting on the "END" beacuse you are in a
PL/pgsql block? If so, I'm not sure if transactions
can work inside this language. Hmm.

Clark

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ulf Mehlig 1999-03-14 08:07:00 Re: [GENERAL] Negating the list of selected rows of a join
Previous Message Clark Evans 1999-03-14 07:18:13 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL EndTransactionBlock and not inprogress/abort state