From: | Philip Shiels <philip(dot)shiels(at)jrc(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Alterations to backend/client protocol |
Date: | 1999-02-23 15:18:36 |
Message-ID: | 36D2C6CC.92534F2E@jrc.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This question is directed at the developers of Postgres.
How open are you to changing the protocol between the backend and the client ?
I posted a question regarding finding the tables to which fields (from a query)
belong. The problem I have is that the only information I have is that the query
is a SELECT. The query is completely arbitrary and I have no idea what the
select contains (and cannot change it).
Is it possible to change the protocol between the backend/client to include the
the table names (or some unique value allowing me get to the table name) ? (for
data that has come directly from the DB and a blank table name for functions
that are not directly represented in a DB table).
Perhaps an option upon connection to use the new protocol (so not all the other
clients that currently work with the existing protocol break).
I am, depending on how much effort this takes, willing to perform the
development myself, can you measure the effort ?
Thanks
Philip
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Shiels E-Mail:Philip(dot)Shiels(at)jrc(dot)it JRC Ispra, Italy, TP270
GIST:http://gist.jrc.it GEM:http://gem.jrc.it
Tutorial:http://gist.jrc.it:8080
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-23 15:28:48 | Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-02-23 15:16:13 | Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? |