On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to accept that we can't make one function name cover all of this.
Well, for me, I would rather specify an array than call a function with a different name. But it’s six of one, half-dozen of another, really, as long as it all works.
D