| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? |
| Date: | 1999-02-10 04:09:13 |
| Message-ID: | 36C10669.7C854F07@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I kinda agree with this one also...as Tom's says, at least ppl can't
> say "Patch B broke things", but they didn't apply Patch A, which B's
> fixes used features from...
*shrug* I don't have a strong feeling about it, and would be happy to
carry along two versions. Especially if one or a few people wanted to
adopt the earlier version to ensure that patches get tested before being
applied and to ensure that builds get tested before release. Over long
periods of time we will accumulate more than a few patches, and there
needs to be some way to ensure the integrity and ongoing testing of the
older tree between releases.
So, are we releasing v6.4.3? If so, when? I'll need to scrub it for
outstanding patches...
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daryl W. Dunbar | 1999-02-10 04:16:20 | RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-02-10 04:01:22 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL and Solaris 7? |