| From: | Stanimir Stanev <stancho(at)macropoint(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Remigiusz Sokolowski <rems(at)gdansk(dot)sprint(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] Has every postgreSQL database own users? |
| Date: | 1999-02-05 10:22:25 |
| Message-ID: | 36BAC660.A8BD76FD@macropoint.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
10x for reply
OK, but every database has pg_user table. Why this table is there?
Remigiusz Sokolowski wrote:
> > hi all
> >
> > Has every postgreSQL database own users?
> >
> > for example:
> >
> > If I have databases with name "db1" and "db2". I want to have user
> > "user1" for "db1" and user "user1" (same name, but with other password)
> > for "db2". Is this available?
> AFAIK this is not possible. Users of postgres are stored in table
> pg_shadow and this table is shared between all of databases. I'm not sure
> if this is also in case when You create another database system, but
> suppose that even in this case user must be unique.
> Rem
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------*------------
> Remigiusz Sokolowski e-mail: rems(at)gdansk(dot)sprint(dot)pl * *
> -----------------------------------------------------------------*****----------
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vcard.vcf | text/x-vcard | 243 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Remigiusz Sokolowski | 1999-02-05 10:38:18 | Re: [SQL] Has every postgreSQL database own users? |
| Previous Message | Dimitri | 1999-02-05 10:16:39 | Re: [SQL] problem with join & count |