Re: [SQL] Java/JDBC/PGSQL Mailing List Archiver

From: Fabrice Scemama <fabrice(dot)scemama(at)gesnet(dot)net>
To:
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Java/JDBC/PGSQL Mailing List Archiver
Date: 1999-01-24 15:29:42
Message-ID: 36AB3C66.66BDC13D@gesnet.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

I globally agree with your points. Thanks for taking time
to write them for us.

If 1, 2, and 3 cannot be considered as essential -- we still
can backup the BLOBs, delete them, etc. with few programming
skills, 4 is very important.

So, as you put it, as far as Mailing List Archives are concerned,
bodies should be split, and attachments BLOBed.

Chavouah Tov!

Fabrice Scemama
Internet Developer too, but in France ;)

Herouth Maoz wrote:
>
> At 2:05 +0200 on 22/1/99, Fabrice Scemama wrote:
>
> > I'd rather not split text messages in 8k parts!
> > That's what BLOBS were designed for
>
> Just to give you a few off points on BLOBs:
>
> (1) They are not dumped with pg_dump, and you have to design your own
> backup procedure for them, which you will be able to integrate later
> with a dumped database.
>
> (2) You can't display them in a casual psql query. I usually use psql
> when I want to check something in my database. Storing the text in
> split records would allow you to view the content in psql.
>
> (3) Sometimes one needs to delete some data which was entered incorrectly
> or as a result of a buggy implementation. If you want to delete a
> large object you have to write a program. If you want to delete a
> bunch of split text records, you only have to enter psql and issue
> a DELETE statement in SQL.
>
> (4) You can't search on large objects. Not even an unindexed search.
> You have to retrieve every large object, and perform the search in
> the front end. If you had it in split text records, you would be
> able to search with LIKE or regexp.
>
> Attachments are a different story. All of the above applies when we are
> dealing with text processing. If the content is something other than text,
> you don't need to search it, there is no point in viewing it in PSQL
> because you need a proper viewer anyway, etc.
>
> So if you want to treat your attachments as binary objects, binary objects
> they should be.
>
> Herouth
>
> --
> Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
> Open University of Israel - Telem project
> http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Perdue, The Des Moines City.net 1999-01-24 17:24:14 Re: [SQL] Java/JDBC/PGSQL Mailing List Archiver
Previous Message Herouth Maoz 1999-01-24 10:52:54 Re: [SQL] Java/JDBC/PGSQL Mailing List Archiver