Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Juan Alvarez Ferrando <juan(at)suzuki(dot)es>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta test of Postgresql 6.5
Date: 1999-01-21 06:12:25
Message-ID: 36A6C549.C794A073@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't object, I just thoght that having as few keywords
> as possible is good thing.

Yes, I understand the concern. But istm it's OK to do things
consistantly throughout the parser once your MVCC project has settled
down. At least as long as the "keyword explosion" stays small...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia 1999-01-21 11:14:38 Performance test with -F (Was Postgres Speed or lack thereof)
Previous Message Taral 1999-01-21 06:05:11 Re: [HACKERS] gzip vs bzip2 in packing