RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved

From: Robert Chalmers <robert(at)chalmers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: psql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved
Date: 1999-01-21 01:51:33
Message-ID: 36A68824.8E2470D8@chalmers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hmmm. Just gave all permisions to user, and created a NEW table database in
Access, and it imported the new permissions.

It seems that Access imports the permissions, and then doesn't let you chang
them, even when they have been changed in the pgsql system.

not a bad idea I usppose.

Now to work out the correct permissions that the ODBC driver should run under.
I notice there is [x]Read Only field in the config... should it be on/offf and
what are the ramifications of that side of it?

Great database engine by the way. especially for ease of use! in my novice
opinion anyway :-)

bob
--
http://www.chalmers.com.au. Publications From China in 24 different languages.
English, French, German, Russian, Arabic, Spanish, Chinese, Burmese, Bengali,
Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Persian, Swahili,
Sinhalese, Thai, Tamil, Urdu, Vietnamese. China Books for CIBTC, Beijing.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Chalmers 1999-01-21 02:29:42 Someone was asking about MEMO fields and sizes?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-21 01:41:52 Re: [GENERAL] Max length of a field name