From: | "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Hiroshi Saito" <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How can I build OSSP UUID support on Windows to avoid duplicate UUIDs? |
Date: | 2013-10-31 12:54:14 |
Message-ID: | 3690DC360D2645C8A77A3AB6927DDE52@maumau |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> ISTM that the biggest problem is that we don't have a random number
> generator which generates enough bits of randomness to implement
> uuid_generate_v3. I think relatively few people would cry if we
> didn't support uuid_generate_v1(), and the others all look simple
> enough, provided there's somewhere to get lots of random bits.
>
> On Linux, it seems like we could get those bits from /dev/urandom,
> though I'm not sure how efficient that would be for the case where
> many UUIDs are being generated at once. But that wouldn't be very
> portable. It's tempting to think that we'd need a PRNG that generates
> wider values, for which we might find other application also. But I'm
> not volunteering to be the one to create such a thing.
OpenSSL provides rand_bytes() which generates random bytes of any length.
It uses /dev/urandom or /dev/random on UNIX/Linux and Crypto API of
Microsoft on Windows.
Regards
MauMau
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitsumasa KONDO | 2013-10-31 13:16:44 | pg_fallocate |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-10-31 12:48:58 | Re: Creating partial index on a relation |