From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpg: large object problems |
Date: | 2003-05-04 01:05:23 |
Message-ID: | 368e408ac6c9457106859cd97086d479@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I'm unfortunately still having problems :-( Can I only do one lo_
> operation per transaction? e.g. is this valid?
Perfectly valid.
> If I only put one lo_ operation per transaction, I get back "0" for the
> fd (is this a valid fd?).
Yes, "0" is not only valid, but fairly common, as it is the fist "slot"
used for large objects.
Other than that, I think you are almost there if you institute the changes
Tom mentioned. Particularly, make sure you check the values of the lo_*
operations to see if they are returning a negative number.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200305032058
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+tGctvJuQZxSWSsgRAr9aAJ4zX5Kl3TxO6CyzPifuXXGgjH+UUACggNs3
zIwyRHIV2UymA3fCy8miJSY=
=NYiw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bob Hartung | 2003-05-04 06:08:41 | How to recover error message at boot time? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-04 00:18:34 | Re: libpg: large object problems |