| From: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres performance |
| Date: | 2013-12-06 18:16:03 |
| Message-ID: | 3689509.Q27PSGIt0i@skynet.simkin.ca |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Friday, December 06, 2013 11:06:58 PM chidamparam muthusamy wrote:
> hi,
> Registered with PostgreSQL Help Forum to identify and resolve the Postgres
> DB performance issue, received suggestions but could not improve the
> speed/response time. Please help.
>
> Details:
> Postgres Version 9.3.1
> Server configuration:
> Processor: 2 x Intel Quad core E5620 @ 2.40GHz
> RAM: 16 GB
>
> Postgres configuration:
> Effective cache size = 10 GB
> shared Buffer = 1250 MB
> random page cost = 4
>
> Table size = 60 GB
> Number of records = 44 million
> Carried out Vacuum Analyze after inserting new records and also after
> creating Index,
> 6 months data, every month around 10 GB will get added. Expecting good
> performance with 3 years data.
> DB Will be used for Reporting/Read, will not be used for transaction. Daily
> records will be inserted through bulk insertion every day.
Suggestions:
Partition by month.
Add many more disks, in RAID-10.
or move to SSD.
Add a lot more RAM.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2013-12-06 18:37:13 | Re: postgres performance |
| Previous Message | chidamparam muthusamy | 2013-12-06 17:36:58 | postgres performance |