Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications
Date: 2022-03-08 16:21:21
Message-ID: 368694.1646756481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> writes:
>> A transaction started with the first statement will not take any SI locks,
>> nor will it ever receive a serialization error.

> What is the meaning of SI? Anything you are aware of in source code or a
> blog post that discusses this?

There's src/backend/storage/lmgr/README-SSI, which might or might
not be the level of detail you are looking for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2022-03-08 16:27:15 Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications
Previous Message Michael Lewis 2022-03-08 16:16:37 Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications