From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Date: | 2022-08-04 23:20:16 |
Message-ID: | 3684408.1659655216@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-08-04 19:01:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (This seems worth fixing before beta3, as it looks like a rather
>> nasty data corruption hazard.)
> Ugh, yes. And even with this fixed I think this should grow at least an
> assertion that the block numbers match, probably even an elog.
Yeah, the assumption that P_NEW would automatically match the source block
was making me itchy too. An explicit test-and-elog seems worth the
cycles.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-04 23:59:22 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-08-04 23:14:08 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |