Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf.sample ordering for IO, worker related GUCs
Date: 2025-01-31 01:55:36
Message-ID: 3682176.1738288536@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> While working on polishing the AIO patchset, I was trying to figure out where
> to fit the new GUCs. So far I had a new "top-level" #--- style section named
> "WIP AIO GUC docs" which I suspect you all won't let me get away with.
> There is an existing (sub-)section which already has a few related GUCs and
> could fit AIO related ones.

I think the normal theory for postgresql.conf.sample is that it should
match the organization of config.sgml. What are you planning there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-01-31 02:08:48 Re: Error in StrategySyncStart() prologue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-01-31 01:53:41 Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql