Re: issue partition scan

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: issue partition scan
Date: 2021-05-25 23:01:39
Message-ID: 366856CE-2043-4163-9753-A735B02E81EA@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> On May 25, 2021, at 15:50, Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> SELECT
> t2.cid_hash AS BILLG_ACCT_CID_HASH ,
> t2.proxy_id AS INDVDL_ENTITY_PROXY_ID ,
> t2.accs_mthd AS ACCS_MTHD_CID_HASH
> FROM
> public.sub t2
> Inner join acc t3 on t3.cid_hash = t2.cid_hash
> Left join sub_soc t4 on (t2.accs_mthd = t4.accs_mthd
> AND t2.cid_hash = t4.cid_hash)
> WHERE
> ( ( (t3.acct = 'I' AND t3.acct_sub IN ( '4',
> '5' ) ) OR t2.ban IN ( '00','01','02','03','04','05' ) )
> OR (t4.soc = 'NFWJYW0' AND t4.curr_ind = 'Y') );

As written, with the OR, it cannot exclude any partitions from the query. The records returned will be from two merged sets:

1. Those that have sub_soc.soc = 'NFWJYW0' and sub_soc.curr_ind = 'Y'

It can use constraint exclusion on these to only scan applicable partitions.

2. Those that have (acc.acct = 'I' AND acc.acct_sub IN ( '4', '5' ) ) OR sub.ban IN ( '00','01','02','03','04','05' )

It can't use constraint exclusion on these, since results can come from any partition.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nagaraj Raj 2021-05-25 23:38:04 Re: issue partition scan
Previous Message Nagaraj Raj 2021-05-25 22:50:48 issue partition scan