Re: Very Poor Insert Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Damien Dougan <damien(dot)dougan(at)mobilecohesion(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very Poor Insert Performance
Date: 2003-10-29 14:23:19
Message-ID: 3667.1067437399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Damien Dougan <damien(dot)dougan(at)mobilecohesion(dot)com> writes:
> Now, our problem seems to be the delays introduced by reading from the
> public views.

Your initial message stated plainly that the problem was in INSERTs;
it's not surprising that you got unhelpful advice.

> View definition:
> [ huge view full of LEFT JOINs ]

> As you can see, the PublicView is resulting in a huge nested loop,
> with an index scan of the contact only occurring at the end. I would
> have expected something more like:

> (1) An index scan of the contact table to determine the correct contact
> (2) An index scan of the address table using the rel_contact_has_address.address_id to obtain the (relatively small - max 16, and typically 2) addresses
> (3) A number of joins - at the same level rather than looping - to obtain the detailnames for the new column names of the public view

Your LEFT JOINs are constraining the join order --- see
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/explicit-joins.html
You'll need to reorder the joins into something that does what you want.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Damien Dougan 2003-10-29 14:40:06 Re: Very Poor Insert Performance
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-10-29 14:03:56 redundent index?