From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Damien Dougan <damien(dot)dougan(at)mobilecohesion(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Very Poor Insert Performance |
Date: | 2003-10-29 14:23:19 |
Message-ID: | 3667.1067437399@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Damien Dougan <damien(dot)dougan(at)mobilecohesion(dot)com> writes:
> Now, our problem seems to be the delays introduced by reading from the
> public views.
Your initial message stated plainly that the problem was in INSERTs;
it's not surprising that you got unhelpful advice.
> View definition:
> [ huge view full of LEFT JOINs ]
> As you can see, the PublicView is resulting in a huge nested loop,
> with an index scan of the contact only occurring at the end. I would
> have expected something more like:
> (1) An index scan of the contact table to determine the correct contact
> (2) An index scan of the address table using the rel_contact_has_address.address_id to obtain the (relatively small - max 16, and typically 2) addresses
> (3) A number of joins - at the same level rather than looping - to obtain the detailnames for the new column names of the public view
Your LEFT JOINs are constraining the join order --- see
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/explicit-joins.html
You'll need to reorder the joins into something that does what you want.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Damien Dougan | 2003-10-29 14:40:06 | Re: Very Poor Insert Performance |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-29 14:03:56 | redundent index? |