From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Virender Singla <virender(dot)cse(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Aniket Jha <aniketkumarj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |
Date: | 2025-02-13 17:33:07 |
Message-ID: | 3663282.1739467987@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Hmm, I think fixing the bug as Tom suggests downthread is probably a
> good idea, but I think we should in addition change pg_dumpall to avoid
> printing a GRANT line if there's no grantee.
On the one hand, my proposed patch can do nothing to fix existing
dangling entries in pg_auth_members, so hacking pg_dump seems like
a good workaround if the problem already exists. On the other hand,
if we make pg_dump do that then we won't detect future problems of
the same ilk.
> Maybe turning one of these LEFT
> JOINs into a regular inner join is a sufficient fix for that:
Probably change all three, if we're to do this at all.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2025-02-14 21:00:09 | BUG #18812: Conditional rule: inconsistent check for statement |
Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-02-13 17:16:02 | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |