Re: Replication slot stats misgivings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Date: 2021-04-17 22:15:36
Message-ID: 366095.1618697736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have pushed the first patch.

The buildfarm suggests that this isn't entirely stable:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anole&dt=2021-04-17%2011%3A14%3A49
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bichir&dt=2021-04-17%2016%3A30%3A15

Each of those animals has also passed at least once since this went in,
so I'm betting on a timing-dependent issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-04-17 22:21:15 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2021-04-17 21:48:41 Re: feature request ctid cast / sql exception