Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it
Date: 2021-12-08 17:05:24
Message-ID: 3660797.1638983124@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Actually, I think it makes more sense to simply revert this. bowerbird,
> like all buildfarm animals, has a working tar.

Right, it doesn't seem like tar is the biggest lift when setting up
a buildfarm critter.

> It's just that this one
> is apparently seriously confused by using paths with a drive spec.

Hm, so how would this test have handled that anyway?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-12-08 17:53:29 Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-12-08 16:53:47 Re: pgsql: Check that we have a working tar before trying to use it