From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c |
Date: | 2022-10-08 17:44:41 |
Message-ID: | 3658511.1665251081@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> When can PostmasterContext be NULL here, and why can we just continue without
> (re-)allocating PMChildInUse?
We'd only get into the !found stanza in a postmaster or a
standalone backend. A standalone backend isn't ever going to call
AssignPostmasterChildSlot or ReleasePostmasterChildSlot, so it
does not need the array; and it also doesn't have a PostmasterContext,
so there's not a good place to allocate the array either.
Perhaps there's a better way to distinguish am-I-a-postmaster,
but I thought checking PostmasterContext is fine since that ties
directly to what the code needs to do.
Yes, the code would malfunction if the PostmasterContext != NULL
condition changed from one cycle to the next, but that shouldn't
happen.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marina Polyakova | 2022-10-08 18:08:18 | Re: ICU for global collation |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-08 17:40:00 | Re: START_REPLICATION SLOT causing a crash in an assert build |