Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
Date: 2024-09-10 20:17:54
Message-ID: 3654856.1725999474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> On Sep 10, 2024, at 14:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Pushed with a little additional polishing.

> Thank you! Do you think it’d be worthwhile to back port to 17?

Not as things stand. If we adopt Peter's nearby position that
the current behavior is actually buggy, then probably back-patching
a corrected version would be worthwhile as a part of fixing it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-09-10 20:24:43 Re: [BUG?] XMLSERIALIZE( ... INDENT) won't work with blank nodes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-09-10 20:16:12 Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()