Re: vacuum timings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuum timings
Date: 2000-01-21 05:51:51
Message-ID: 3641.948433911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I loaded 10,000,000 rows into CREATE TABLE test (x INTEGER); Table is
> 400MB and index is 160MB.

> With index on the single in4 column, I got:
> 78 seconds for a vacuum
> 121 seconds for vacuum after deleting a single row
> 662 seconds for vacuum after deleting the entire table

> With no index, I got:
> 43 seconds for a vacuum
> 43 seconds for vacuum after deleting a single row
> 43 seconds for vacuum after deleting the entire table

> I find this quite interesting.

How long does it take to create the index on your setup --- ie,
if vacuum did a drop/create index, would it be competitive?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Schulz 2000-01-21 05:58:43 Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-21 05:49:34 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster